AI Unshackled, Safety Nets Slashed: The GOP’s High-Stakes Gamble

Senate removes AI regulation ban as GOP pushes massive bill cutting safety nets, raising debt, and boosting defense and immigration.
In a dramatic turn of legislative events, the U.S. Senate has voted overwhelmingly to remove a controversial federal ban on state-level regulation of artificial intelligence, a move embedded in the broader context of President Trump’s sweeping tax-cut and spending package. This megabill, characterized by its aggressive rollback of social safety net programs and substantial increase in national debt, signals a profound shift in Republican priorities.
The decision to strike down the 10-year moratorium on AI regulation—originally included in the bill—was led by Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn and passed with a near-unanimous 99-1 vote. This reversal highlights a rare bipartisan consensus on the need for more localized oversight of AI, particularly as concerns grow over its societal, economic, and ethical ramifications.
Yet, this pivotal AI policy change is overshadowed by the broader implications of the legislation, which passed the Senate by the slimmest of margins: 51-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tiebreaking vote. The bill’s passage came after a relentless “vote-a-rama,” where amendments flew thick and fast as party leaders scrambled to secure support from dissenting Republicans.
Chief among the holdouts was Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, whose concerns over Medicaid cuts and rural healthcare services were assuaged through last-minute concessions. These included a $50 billion provision for rural hospitals and increased food aid targeting her state. Still, three Republican senators—Tillis, Collins, and Paul—joined Democrats in opposition, highlighting intraparty fractures
At the heart of the bill lies a potent cocktail of policies that deeply reflect Trump-era conservative doctrine: permanent extensions of the 2017 tax cuts, new tax breaks for tipped and overtime income, an expanded military and immigration enforcement budget, and a rollback of climate incentives from the Biden administration. All of this comes at a steep cost: an additional $3.3 trillion added to the national debt and a proposed $930 billion cut to Medicaid and food assistance programs.
These cuts have sparked outrage, particularly from Democrats and moderate Republicans, who fear the social and economic consequences. Independent analyses warn that nearly 12 million Americans may lose health coverage under the new Medicaid rules, while tightened eligibility for nutrition assistance could increase food insecurity. The Congressional Budget Office has warned that the bill’s benefits would disproportionately favor the wealthiest 1%, reinforcing existing economic inequalities.
In a bid to appease hardline fiscal conservatives, the bill includes measures aimed at reducing “waste, fraud, and abuse” in welfare programs. Yet, critics argue this language thinly veils deep structural cuts that will leave vulnerable populations—particularly in rural and low-income areas—without essential support.
Outside the Capitol, the political ramifications continue to unfold. Billionaire Elon Musk, once a Trump ally, has turned against the bill, calling it fiscally irresponsible and threatening to fund challengers to supporting Republicans in the upcoming midterms.
Meanwhile, Speaker Mike Johnson is racing to bring the legislation to a House vote before the July 4 holiday. However, a coalition of moderate Republicans, Freedom Caucus members, and representatives from high-tax states have raised serious objections to key provisions, including the depth of Medicaid cuts and the lack of broader deductions for state and local taxes.
As President Trump eyes a ceremonial signing timed to Independence Day, the battle over the bill has laid bare deep ideological divides—not only between parties, but within the Republican ranks themselves. The removal of the AI regulation ban may be a symbolic victory for advocates of technological accountability, but it is the bill’s sweeping assault on the welfare state that will likely shape American lives—and political battles—for years to come.
Learn more about artificial intelligence policy here.